Mumford is such a lovely writer, and it's easy to think that what he lacks in primary research he more than makes up for in thought-provoking speculation. He's a utopian thinker who advocates a balance between humans and their environment in the form of decentered, thoughtful, federated social structures. He also writes a lot about the relationship between space and technology. This book is a ginormous grand narrative of "the city" in Western civilization, from the very dawn of time to the present, so here are just a few of my notes:
In an era shaped by white flight, deindustrialization/ suburbanization, not to mention the fear of nuclear war, Mumford calls for a return to city building instead of
destruction. He argues that cities serve two main purposes: religion and the
state. Biology is a (distant?) third,
though really cities are for the people, so people should come first. The shrine and the citadel are its two dominant structures, carried over
from villages. The city exists to
nurture human biological and cultural reproduction, not to use technology to
tame whole populations into submission. The city is the stand-in for society, and he is very adamant that spatial forms and social forms
interconnect. Also, space and the built environment are articulated with technology;
humans shouldn’t be afraid of their own inventions or let a few wackos use
technology to control them. The city
should be humanity, magnified; communality, nurturing, love. I sense Hardt & Negri here, where a
surplus of love and community lead to a radical democracy, and also the dread fear of totalitarianism and
technology, which apparently went hand-in-hand in WWII, what with the Nazis and
all.