Massey's For Space is an attempt to develop a theory of subjectivity/ agency through a postmodern conception of space as geographical, temporal, and relational. Because of Cresswell, I expected Massey’s construction of
“the spatial” as relational flows, especially in counterpoint to Harvey’s
construction of place as nodes where the flows of capital get stuck.
But I didn’t expect her to be so tightly
bound with high postmodern thinkers. Massey draws a great deal from Laclau & Mouffe’s radical democracy and Deleuze’s
reconfiguration of subjects from nodes to trajectories; I guess this is what
happens when you shift focus from bodies to space as the field where bodies interact. Of particular interest to me is her search
for agency/ construction of radical subjectivity as uniquely spatial,
outwardlooking and aware of its own relational constitution. Space, rather than time, makes agency possible.
Massey is trying to find a way to move beyond
Modernism, which (she says) falsely annihilates space through time, and beyond the
extremes of Postmodernism, which falsely annihilates time through space, and to
articulate depth with breadth. Yes, connecting depth with breadth is the project of all cultural theory, but her solution – to focus on
space-time as the product of relations/ interactions between heterogeneous
elements dissolves binaries like global/
local, place/space, space/time, and thereby makes space for agency. She does a better job of situating potential
agents within an uneven power grid than do Laclau & Mouffe/ other radical
democracy theorists, but I do wonder if she’s falsely assuming that everyone
would take freedom if given the space to do so - in which case she’s more of a product of the Enlightenment than she
cares to admit. (Not a bad thing to
think that all people are fundamentally equal on some level; I’m just
sayin…)
Anyway. I like that space and social relations are
mutually constitutive – the concept is very useful for talking about transportation-based
social movements. She’s also got a nice
discussion of how local movements might articulate into larger global struggles
that looks a lot like how (radical) transportation movements, by
their nature, have to grow. And she
clearly reads. A lot.
Originally published on 6.17.12.
Originally published on 6.17.12.
No comments:
Post a Comment