Edward Relph's The Modern Urban Landscape examines the landscapes of large cities since 1880 for clues as to the relationship between modernization and urban form. In particular, he studies the visual landscapes of the "modern parts of towns and cities" in North America, Britain, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand; building on this firsthand experience, he concludes that "the modern urban landscape is both rationalised and artificial, which is another way of saying that it is intensely human, an expression of human will and deeply imbued with meaning." He thus shifts the focus of human geography from the rural to the urban, while retaining the discipline's focus on empirical observations of coherent visual landscapes.
To collect data on the changes in urban architecture, planning, technology and social conditions since 1880, Relph takes the "geographical" approach of "watching:" he starts with "the totality of what I see," then follows "several directions more or less at once," looking for unusual details, new developments, and ironic juxtapositions within the larger context of the urban fabric. Landscapes, to Relph, are the "visual contexts of daily existence," and he insists on retaining the wholeness of the urban landscape because so much of landscape is about context, about the relationships between buildings and the streets and spaces and other structures around them, that you cannot study any one element in isolation. Only by preserving landscape's "fragile wholeness" can we hope to learn anything about how it functions.
Showing posts with label human geography. Show all posts
Showing posts with label human geography. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Monday, April 8, 2013
120: Yi-Fu Tuan's Topophilia
Yi-Fu Tuan's Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes, and Values argues that because humans are the "ecological dominant," understanding the environment requires first understanding human behavior in depth, so that we can see how our attitudes, beliefs, passions and values shape and are shaped by the environment. This claim that human perception and experience is an important component of the environment and a valid geographical topic is in direct response to the scientific reductionism of post-WWII geography; it seeks to bring human culture back into the "practical" study of the environment by putting "topophilia," or "the affective bond between people and place or setting," at the center of geographic research.
Although Topophilia intentionally does not have a stated method, it does have a theoretical framework. Tuan sets out to examine environmental perception and values at the levels of the species, group, and individual; to hold culture (or topophilia) distinct from the environment to show how
Although Topophilia intentionally does not have a stated method, it does have a theoretical framework. Tuan sets out to examine environmental perception and values at the levels of the species, group, and individual; to hold culture (or topophilia) distinct from the environment to show how
119: Yi-Fu Tuan's Space & Place
From my notes from Spring 2012:
In Space and Place, Yi-Fu Tuan develops
three themes: the relationship between space and the human body; the
relationship between place and space; and the range of human experience or
knowledge of space and place. He argues
that human experience of the world (in all its fullness) both shapes and is
shaped by space and place. Tuan develops
this humanist argument against more abstract geographical conceptions of space;
this book is generally considered to be the first “human geography” book. For Tuan, experience is both feeling and
thought. Experience consists of all the
myriad ways in which humans interact with their environment: via the body (the
five senses, along with “sensorimotor,” moving through a space, and “skin”),
via the imagination (including myths, fantasy, narration, memory), and
conceptually or rationally (a big-picture, god’s-eye view). Space is more abstract, something that you
move through and dominate; think openness, spaciousness. Places “stay put;” they acquire value when
humans pause in their movements through space and stop to experience them, to
create memories there, or to otherwise create links between themselves and a
physical location. While a single human
experience cannot possibly encompass the complexity of the real world, full
experience of space and place, is integral to the development of human
consciousness and culture and to the reintegration of body and mind
(discourse).
Labels:
body,
Cultural Geography,
experience,
human geography,
movement,
myth,
place,
place and region,
representation,
space,
subjectivity,
time,
universal
Sunday, April 7, 2013
109: Tim Cresswell's Place
Tim Cresswell's Place: A Short Introduction is a lovely lit review of cultural geography debates on the concept of place. While Cresswell is clear and thoughtful about each of the geographers he discusses, his own definition of place is as a "meaningful location," which he likes because it is both subjective and objective, both physical and cultural. In addition, his research focuses on social difference and place, what it means to transgress a place, and what it means to be out of place - "anachorism."
The three levels of place:
The three levels of place:
- Descriptive; visual; surfaces
- Social construction; practice; social difference
- Phenomenological; essential; humanist; universal
At one point or another, cultural geography has embraced one or more of these levels.
98: Adams, Hoelscher & Till's Textures of Place
Adams, Hoelscher, and Till's Textures of Place: Exploring Humanist Geographies originated in a 1998 special session celebrating Tuan's retirement and critiquing and updating his work; the essays include students of Tuan's, later geographers, and people who aren't geographers at all but who appreciate his work. In their intro, the editors revise and add to humanist geography's subjective conception of place by
- setting up a dialectic between physical places and human experience of/ apprehension of/ construction of places
- rejecting the search for universal understandings of place (a la Tuan) in favor of multiple meanings shaped by both individual subjectivities and social differences, including race, class, gender, and sexuality
- putting places in social, geographical, and historical context
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




